Skip to main content

Table 2 Diagnostic Imaging Reported on Referral Letters Versus Actual Imaging Performed on the Patient, %

From: Quality and continuity of information between primary care physicians and rheumatologists

Diagnosis

Any Diagnostic Imaging Reported on the Referral Letter

Actual Imaging Performed on the Patienta

Radiographs

Ultrasound

MRI

All patients n = 2430

33.7

44.7

15.2

6.0

Systemic inflammatory n = 745

30.0

49.4

14.8

6.3

 RA n = 120

32.5

56.7

10.0

5.0

 IA, other n = 167

32.3

52.1

16.8

5.4

 Crystal n = 122

40.1

54.9

8.2

NR

 PMR n = 66

13.6

43.9

27.3

NR

 SpA n = 76

40.8

50.0

13.2

11.8

 PsA n = 44

36.4

45.5

13.6

NR

 Other SARDs n = 150

12.0

39.3

17.3

8.0

Osteoarthritis n = 787

46.4

49.9

14.1

5.5

Regional MSK syndromes n = 395

34.9

41.5

17.7

5.8

Chronic pain conditions n = 346

22.0

33.0

15.9

7.2

Osteoporosis/osteopenia n = 45

24.4

37.8

NR

NR

Other/miscellaneousb n = 112

12.5

27.7

17.0

6.3

  1. Values are the percentage with the denominator being the N within each diagnosis category
  2. Abbreviations: RA rheumatoid arthritis, IA inflammatory arthritis, PMR polymyalgia rheumatica, SpA spondyloarthritis, PsA psoriatic arthritis, SARDs systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases, MSK musculoskeletal
  3. NR Not reportable (to protect patient privacy)
  4. aDiagnostic imaging performed within the 3 months period prior to referral
  5. SARDs include lupus, scleroderma, vasculitis, Sjögren’s syndrome, dermatomyositis, polymyositis, Raynaud’s phenomenon, sarcoidosis, etc. (not defined in the previous categories)
  6. bMiscellaneous referrals such as abnormal tests